Showing posts with label Wells Fargo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wells Fargo. Show all posts

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Los Angeles Sues U.S. Bank, Calls It a 'Slumlord'

 
By Jonathan Stempel

The city of Los Angeles has sued U.S. Bank, accusing a unit of the fifth-largest U.S. commercial bank of becoming one of its biggest slumlords and blighting the city by allowing hundreds of foreclosed homes to fall into disrepair.

Monday's civil lawsuit by the office of Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich alleges that U.S. Bank has taken title to more than 1,500 foreclosed residential properties in the city in its role as trustee for various mortgage-backed securities trusts.

Los Angeles said that at least since July 2008, U.S. Bank has "disregarded virtually every one of its legal duties and responsibilities as owner, resulting in the creation and maintenance of an alarming number of vacant nuisance properties and substandard occupied housing units."

It said the bank has ignored repeated demands that it comply with the law, causing hundreds of homes to become uninhabitable or "public nuisances," and resulting in illegal evictions of hundreds of tenants from the second most-populous U.S. city.

Los Angeles said that it is seeking a civil fine of $2,500 a day for each violation by what it called "one of the largest slumlords in the city." It estimated the bank's potential liability to be in the "hundreds of millions of dollars."

Thomas Joyce, a spokesman for Minneapolis-based U.S. Bank, said it is the mortgage servicers, not the trustee, who have the responsibility to maintain foreclosed properties, and that "we intend to bring them into" the lawsuit.

Joyce also said the city only recently agreed to detail which homes needed better upkeep, and that the bank will "stand ready" to address property-specific and general foreclosure concerns as it has done in other cities.

Other Cities' Lawsuits

Other large U.S. cities have also sued over mortgage industry practices that they allege contributed to urban blight.

Wells Fargo & Co, the nation's largest mortgage lender, in May settled a lawsuit by Memphis, Tenn., and on July 12 it settled a similar case involving Baltimore.

The Baltimore accord was reached in connection with the San Francisco-based bank's $175 million settlement with the federal government over allegations that it overcharged black and Hispanic borrowers on mortgages, contributing to higher foreclosures.

Wells Fargo was one of five big servicers to join February's $25 billion U.S. settlement over foreclosure abuses.

The National Fair Housing Alliance filed discrimination complaints with the federal government in April against both U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo, accusing them of doing a better job maintaining foreclosed homes in white neighborhoods than in minority neighborhoods.

According to the 2010 census, Los Angeles had 1.41 million housing units, of which about 95,000 were vacant. The city's population was about 3.79 million.

Shares of U.S. Bancorp were down 9 cents at $32.69 in morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case is People v. U.S. Bank NA et al, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, No. BC488436.

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 29, 2011

PHISHING ALERT

Home / News
7:52 pm | August 29, 2011

'Wells Fargo Bank' Phishing Calls Hit Area

POSTED: 4:24 pm PDT August 29, 2011
AAAText Size
PrintEmail
The Oregon Department of Justice Consumer Hotline has received a surge of complaints about telephone calls claiming to be from Wells Fargo Bank. The caller is telling consumers that their debit cards are locked and that they should provide their debit card number to bank security. This is a phishing scam -- and it hit the High Desert Monday.

Oregon Attorney General John Kroger reminded Oregonians that legitimate financial institutions will never ask you for debit card, bank account or social security numbers, or for sensitive information, like your username or password, over the phone or by email.

• Never respond to phone calls or emails soliciting personal information. If you suspect it might be legitimate, pick-up the phone and call the company to confirm.

• Do not click on any links embedded in phishing emails. They may contain viruses or malware designed to steal your personal information.

• Make sure your computer has up to date anti-virus software.

The Attorney General's Consumer Hotline received nine complaints since late last week from the Portland area and the Willamette Valley about this scam, a significant number of calls for such a short period of time -- and many Central Oregonians reported getting similar calls Monday. Bank officials said they had been getting numerous calls about the scammers.

Anyone who believes they have been approached by a scammer should contact the Oregon Department of Justice at 1-877-877-9392 or www.oregonattorneygeneral.gov

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, August 28, 2011

ON DEBIT CARD CHARGES ALWAYS CHOOSE THE "CREDIT" OPTION RATHER THAN "DEBIT" OPTION AT CHECK-OUT. YOU DON'T HAVE TO REMEMBER YOUR PIN, AND THE STORE, RATHER THAN YOU, PAYS FOR THE TRANSACTION. WHY SHOULD YOU BE PUNISHED WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO USE YOUR DEBIT CARD TO PAY FOR PURCHASES? I DO STILL ENCOURAGE YOU TO MOVE YOUR MONEY TO A SMALL LOCAL CREDIT UNION. WELLS FARGO IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED WITH YOUR MONEY.


Proposed debit fees not welcomed by all

By Stella Davis
Current-Argus Staff Writer




Click photo to enlarge
A Wells-Fargo customer uses the main bank's ATM machine to get some weekend cash. On Oct. 14,...
CARLSBAD — Come October, many Wells Fargo bank customers will see another fee on their monthly checking account statement. That fee, some local Wells Fargo customers say, is pushing them to move their accounts to other local banks.
Starting in October in test markets in five states including New Mexio, Wells Fargo will charge customers $3 a month if they use their debit card to make purchases. Customers can avoid the fee if they don't use their card or by signing up for certain checking accounts, said Jennifer Riordan, Wells Fargo director of media relations for New Mexico.
"The proposed fee is per checking account, not per debit card," Riordan said. "Also, there is some confusion that every time a customer makes a purchase with the debit card, a $3 fee will be tacked on to every purchase. That's not true."
She said customers using the debit card at an ATM machine only or for identification will not incur the $3 monthly fee.
The guinea pigs will be customers who opened business and personal accounts in New Mexico Oregon, Nevada, Georgia and Washington. It won't affect customers elsewhere unless they originally opened their accounts in one of those states, a Wells Fargo spokeswoman said.
On Friday, some Wells Fargo customers using the ATM machine at the main branch at 115 W. Fox St., said they were unaware of the impending $3 fee, while others said they are in the process of switching their checking accounts to a local bank that does not

Advertisement

charge a fee for the use of a debit card.
"I have already opened an account at another bank. I'm just waiting for my direct deposit to switch from my Wells Fargo account and then I'll close it," said Scott London. "Why should I spend my money on something when I can get it for free?"
Rex Allen Clark said he has banked with Wachovia since 1992, and since Wells Fargo's takeover of Wachovia, it is his opinion that both banking companies had gone into a downward spiral in terms of customer services.
"I think it is unfair that they are going to be charging $3. It really sucks," Clark said.
Heath Nesbitt said: "I don't like it. I'm probably going to go to a different bank."
Waiting her turn at the ATM, Carmen Smith reacted to learning of the fee: "Oh really. That's too bad. I will have to look into that. I have accounts at a different bank in town and I will probably move my checking account over there. Big banking companies shouldn't be doing that."
Sulema Sias, who said she and her family recently moved to Carlsbad, said that she was unaware of the impending fee.
"To me, three dollars is three dollars. I'm going to talk to my husband about this and see about moving our account," she said.
Taking a puff on his cigarette, Jerry McCoy gave some thought to the question about the $3 fee.
"If it's only three dollars a month, I probably could handle that. But I feel sorry for the people that can't afford an extra three dollars a month."
The Denver Post reported that the move comes as banks are bracing for lost "swipe fees" that merchants pay when customers use debit cards in their stores. As a requirement of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, the Federal Reserve in June capped these fees at about 21 cents per transaction, down from an average of about 44 cents per transaction. Banks lobbied fiercely to delay or jettison the provision.
Wells Fargo isn't the first to institute such a charge and won't be the last, Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at research firm Bankrate.com. told the Denver Post.
"The result of the change in the debit-card interchange rule is that consumers get stuck with the bill," he said.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has been testing a similar $3-a-month charge in northern Wisconsin since February, a bank spokesman said. Only one of the bank's four checking-account options comes with the fee.
Some banks are also curtailing debit-card rewards programs. Wells Fargo stopped enrolling customers in debit-card reward programs in March.
In their test programs, banks will closely monitor customer attrition, McBride said. Some customers who pay close attention to fees will "vote with their feet" and close their accounts. Others will pay the fee to avoid the inconvenience of opening new accounts and transferring bill-payment information, he said.
Banks have been adding new fees and revoking free checking programs as they lose revenue from overdraft fees, credit-card charges and now debit-card swipe fees.
Wells Fargo also has made changes as part of its Wachovia merger. The bank last year eliminated ATM fee waivers that some Wachovia customers once received in some accounts.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 25, 2011

PISSED CONSUMER IS A GREAT SOURCE OF INFO, AND A GREAT PLACE TO VENT YOUR FRUSTRATION


WELLS FARGO
CREDIT RUINED LAWSUIT
WHO WANTS IN?

Wells Fargo Complaint



I attempted to do a mortgage modification through Wells Fargo, they have destroyed our credit, denied us the modification and are now demanding absurd amounts of money to avoid collection action. This has been thebiggest mistake of our lives as we had never been late with a payment prior to this. We have hired a law firm to represent us, they are agreeing to sue wells fargo on a contigent basis and are looking to make this a class action as more parties have come forward. If you have been victimized by this bank, email me at seadoo6644@yahoo.com We can do something about this abuse. This is not a joke. 38effb





  Comments (22)
RSS comments



1. Written by RENNIE3030 on July 21, 2011 

I too have been ruined by Wells Fargo. I had perfect credit before they refinaced my 3 loans,and then they inflated the appraisels. After the refi was finished it was going to be some Crazy amount after 3 years, so i decided to try to refi through them again to lower the payment.( Before the third year) but they insisted that I had to be behind on my mortgage payment before they would help me. ( To make this short) I lost all the property i had and had to file Chap 7.



And here before they came along i had perfect Credit, now I can't even finance a cup of milk. Lets get them!!! If we stick together we can do this....I am so ready :x




2. Written by RENNIE3030 on July 21, 2011 

I too have been ruined by Wells Fargo. I had perfect credit before they refinaced my 3 loans,and then they inflated the appraisels. After the refi was finished it was going to be some Crazy amount after 3 years, so i decided to try to refi through them again to lower the payment.( Before the third year) but they insisted that I had to be behind on my mortgage payment before they would help me. ( To make this short) I lost all the property i had and had to file Chap 7.



And here before they came along i had perfect Credit, now I can't even finance a cup of milk. Lets get them!!! If we stick together we can do this....I am so ready




3. Written by very angry person with these i on December 23, 2010 

I keep hearing the same thing...I want to just leave home...but I will do whatever to make sure they pay for this mess!!




4. Written by Unbelieving on October 18, 2010 

This "bank" has incompetence at every level that is hard to be believed. They appear not to be able to complete any transaction that does not fit in a preprogrammed automated decision channel. We had a similar situation to some of those mentioned above, but after extended periods of silence, found they were disinterested in a modification (even as they continued to mail us material encouraging us to pursue help) since as the 1st mortgagor they knew they were going to get their money even if the other lenders did not. We had to borrow from one of the others to get out of the hole. Across the months we talked with them their message was at one time encouraging, incomplete, misleading, unresponsive, contradictory, evasive, or simply disconnected. All the while they continued to mail various related yet incongruous materials. I was never a believer that these mega-banks should have simply been allowed to fail, but I have to believe that a positive outcome may have been found in the smoldering pieces if this one would have imploded.



Incompetent/Derelict at best -- Pattern of Fraud (in the message to the government and American people) at worst.



Please let me know more info on the class action, this is a day in court well earned!




5. Written by Mike on October 13, 2010 

Has anyone filed a class action against Wells Fargo? The senerio: Being put on a Trial payment period and then told that we don't qualify for a modification even after 6 months of being on the program. I feel that would be a case. If you are in that boat send me an email usabottles@juno.com




6. Written by djeverette3@hotmail.com on June 27, 2010 

Ditto. Let me know where the civil action lawsuits against wells fargo are and I will join.

DJE




7. Written by RHut072976 on May 10, 2010 

I did go thru wells fargo and got the modification, they refuse to send me a copy of the signed contract, they did not give me everything they said I would get, and then said they give the same contract to everyone, they just change the iterest rates for each person. Then they said I would not have to pay any fees, I am now 10,000.00 more than what I was before the modification. They had me make 3 payments to prove I could pay on time, and still can not tell me where my 4000.00 is. Now that they did the modification, it shows up on my credit report as late every moth, wells fargo said it is because the payment you pay for lets say May is applied to April, which is bull ***. GOOD LUCK TO ANYONE WHO GETS WELLS FARGO.




8. Written by Nadine on April 11, 2010 

I was mislead by Wells Fargo and am willing to tell my story. I'm tired of this abuse...once as a late teen trying to get started and now as a mommy of two. If we don't stand up and fight, this will never end.




9. Written by Wells Fargo Ruined Our Credit on March 26, 2010 

I had approached Wells Fargo for temporary assistance (for 2 months) to defer payments. They told me that they don't defer but offered modification by lowering our payments. My husband is a Fire Fighter and he was transitioning between a City position to a County position. This is when I approached Wells Fargo for help. Since it would take approximately 2 months for academy in w/c his salary would drop. We've made every payment (never late) and yet are suffering the consequence because now our credit is ruined. Wells Fargo reported us late on payments when we paid the agreed upon amount. The worst part is I asked several times if our credit would be affected and was told 'NO'. I brought this up when I complained and they told me that I should have known since we agreed to the loan modification. My husband and I make enough money to purchase another home and now our plans of expanding into a larger home are ruined by these idiots. Our little ones are growing up and I'm afraid we won't be able to get into a larger home for them to each have their own space. I'm just in disbelief that this could have happened to us. I want in on this Lawsuit because I truly believe we were wronged!




10. Written by HowToGetItDone on March 15, 2010 

See my 03/15 post on 12/10 modification link. This should answer most all of your questions and gripes!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 18, 2011

EVIDENCE DESTROYED.


BATTLE HEATING UP: SEC, GOLDMAN AND OTHERS DESTROYING DOCUMENTS

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

FROM MARKET WATCH

SEC may have destroyed documents, senator says

Grassley: Agency may have got rid of Goldman, Madoff documents

By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch
Updates to include SEC settlement with Aguirre
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The Securities and Exchange Commission may have destroyed documents and compromised enforcement cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the height of the financial crisis in 2008, according to allegations made by a lawmaker on Wednesday.
“From what I’ve seen, it looks as if the SEC might have sanctioned some level of case-related document destruction,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, in a letter to the agency’s chairman, Mary Schapiro.
Sen. Chuck Grassley
“It doesn’t make sense that an agency responsible for investigations would want to get rid of potential evidence. If these charges are true, the agency needs to explain why it destroyed documents, how many documents it destroyed over what timeframe, and to what extent its actions were consistent with the law.”
Agency staff “destroyed over 9,000 files” related to preliminary agency investigations, according to a letter sent in July to Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and obtained by MarketWatch.
The allegations were made by SEC enforcement attorney, Darcy Flynn, in a letter to Grassley. Flynn is a current employee, and according to the letter, received a bonus for his past year’s work.
Flynn alleges the SEC destroyed files related to matters being examined in important cases such as Bernard Madoff and a $50 billion Ponzi scheme he operated as well as an investigation involving Goldman Sachs Group Inc. GS -3.96%   trading in American International Group credit-default swaps in 2009.
Flynn also alleged that the agency destroyed documents and information collected for preliminary investigations at Wells Fargo & Co. WFC -5.23% , Bank of America Corp.BAC -5.93% , Citigroup C -7.89%  , Credit Suisse CS -9.28%  , Deutsche Bank DB -7.79%  Morgan Stanley MS -6.17%  and the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers.
The letter goes into particular detail about Deutsche Bank, the former employer of current SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami as well as former enforcement chiefs Gary Lynch and Richard Walker.
The allegations that the SEC destroyed documents were first reported by the Rolling Stone magazine in a report Wednesday.
An SEC spokesman did not return a request for comment. However, according to the Rolling Stone article, the SEC told the National Archives and Records Administration that the commission “is not aware of any specific instances of the destruction of records from any other MUI.”
The SEC added that it “cannot say with certainty that no such documents have been destroyed over the past 17 years.” Read Grassley’s letter to the SEC
Flynn’s lawyer, Gary Aguirre, was a former SEC attorney. Aguirre was fired in September 2005 as he was investigating allegations of insider trading at the major hedge fund Pequot Capital Management.

7 Responses

  1. Nancy Drew or Mary Cochraine–I think we all know how to manuever around in LivingLies to find Neil’s posts. It is rather redundant to post links to his already posted commentaries.
    His site is very easy to manuever and he has a ‘search’ area at top right of the page.
    I know you mean well, but it is rather redundant.

  2. NOTE: DOCUMENTS BEING DESTROYED DIRECTLY RELATED TO ‘TRUSTEES’
    TRUSTEES responsbile for nationwide sale and resale of real estate loans.
    TRUSTEES responsible for nationwide purchse of mortgage notes and reselling servicing rights c/o Master Servicer.
    One ‘loan trust’ the TRUSTEE responsible for all of the ‘collateral’ transferred in and out of the trust.
    Very clean line of business moving electronically on intergrated network all of the TRUSTEES’ vendors, providers, affilaites transactions in which consumer complaints reveal any ‘issues.’
    FEDERAL RESERVE birds eye view of all complaints by individual consumers and commercial consumers via OCC and OTS for the SEC would have to contact the OCC and/or OTS to review evidence




  3. EXTRA-Ordinary Powers vested by CONGRESS under Article I, Congressional Branch makes laws and vests powers.
    EXTRA-Ordinary Powers Vested To:
    FEDERAL RESERVE
    Congress prevents enforcement of laws by Executive Branch under Article II vested powers to enforce laws by
    Congress vested Jurisdiction over unlawful business acts to Attorney Generals
    Exception: related to FEDERAL RESERVE
    Will ‘TRUSTEE’ with national assocaition and federal association affixed to their ‘brand label’ be protected under the latest attempt to enforce stautory laws of the USA?
    President Obama how much do you want to get reelected?
    As Commander-In-Chief I mean no disrepsect to you personally. Your ‘office’ has powers to bring into the light of day who harmed economy.

  4. DOCUMENTS DESTROYED FOR BENEFIT OF ‘TRUSTEE’
    AND HOW DID TRUSTEE’S KNOW WHICH DOCUMENTS TO DESTROY?
    ALL ‘INVESTIGATIONS’ OF ALL COMPLAINTS OF ‘CONSUMERS’ C/O OCC & OTC C/O FEDERAL RESERVE!


Enhanced by Zemanta