Showing posts with label Bank of America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank of America. Show all posts

Friday, October 28, 2011

WHAT ABOUT HOMEOWNER HOSKING? WAKE UP AG KAMALA HARRIS AND DOBERMAN MITCHELL J. STEIN AND HELP VIRGINIA HOSKING WHO IS SCARED OUT OF HER MIND, WAITING TO BE FORCED FROM HER HOME. FOCUS!


Lawyer accused of mortgage-related fraud sues attorney general

Jeff Turner/Flickr
Los Angeles-area attorney Mitchell J. Stein refers to himself as "The Doberman" and his website advertises, "You Hold The Leash."
In August, California Attorney General Kamala Harris raided Stein's offices and accused him and other lawyers of fraudulently misleading thousands of struggling homeowners into paying to be part of mass lawsuits against mortgage lenders like Bank of America.
But Stein sued back, after warning on his Twitteraccount that "The Doberman is about to take a large bite out of Kamala Harris." Stein has accused the attorney general of being "the pawn of America’s most powerful banks,” claiming that Bank of America "corruptly funneled money" to Harris, according to one of his lawsuits.
As the legal sparring continues, the alleged fraud victims are running out of time.
Virginia Hosking received a notice last week directing her to vacate her foreclosed Whittier house within three days.
Report an error: See something wrong in this story?
E-mail our editors.
"Now I’m sitting here freaking out, afraid to walk out my front door in case they come lock me out," Hosking said.
Hosking said her husband had just passed away and she was facing foreclosure last year when she paid $4,000 to another law firm targeted in Harris' fraud suit.
Hosking said she was told that joining the lawsuit against her mortgage lender, Bank of America, would help save her house. At some point, Stein's firm, which has been suing Bank of America since 2009, took charge of Hosking's case.
The attorney general accused the lawyers of deceiving homeowners into thinking that the lawsuits would stop foreclosures or reduce their mortgage payments. In a press conference announcing the action, Harris called it "work that will bring justice to many homeowners in California who were targeted by predators who happened to have a law license."
Stein, who signs e-mails with a picture of a Doberman pinscher, claims that he is "Bank of America’s biggest nightmare" and that Harris' suit puts struggling homeowners at risk.
He points out that Harris received four donations in February, totaling $1,500, from attorneys with the law firm representing Bank of America.
Stein's recent lawsuit accuses Harris of doing the bidding of Bank of America by removing "the superstar who had been beating the bank to a pulp for two and a half years."
Shum Preston, a spokesman for Harris, called the suit frivolous.
"We respectfully decline to address the very strange claims made in this lawsuit," he said in a statement. "It is, sadly, another example of what we uncovered during our investigations: false promises designed to lure already distressed homeowners into paying money to lawyers who refuse to properly represent them."
A Bank of America spokeswoman declined to comment.
Stein's office sent e-mails to clients like Hosking asking them to show up at a court hearing to support Stein "in the fight against bank and government corruption."
His firm sent out a press release that said hundreds of homeowners would gather in solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement and "against Ms. Harris' support of the 1%."
Meanwhile, the State Bar of California obtained a court order stating that Stein "has become incapable of devoting the time and attention to ... his law practice" and authorizing the bar to seize his files and freeze his bank accounts.
Stein, however, maintains the order doesn't apply because it names Mitchell J. Stein and Associates and not his newer partnership, Mitchell J. Stein & Associates LLP. For the same reason, Stein's website states, "this law Firm has never been sued by the State of California."
Stein is also trying to stop seizure of his assets through his Florida bankruptcy proceeding.
The state bar notified Hosking that she could pick up the confiscated files relating to her, but she would have to find another lawyer.
Hosking keeps getting solicitations promising to save her house if she pays a fee.
"There are all kinds of preying people out there. I don’t know who to trust anymore," she said.
The state bar will work to return money to alleged victims from Stein's frozen funds, said Suzan Anderson, an attorney for the bar. Authorities also are encouraging banks to give a break to people like Hosking.
"Right now, the attorney general and the state bar are discussing with the lenders how they might be able to put a hold on any foreclosures because of these actions and maybe work with the people and give them time," Anderson said.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 29, 2011

PHISHING ALERT

Home / News
7:52 pm | August 29, 2011

'Wells Fargo Bank' Phishing Calls Hit Area

POSTED: 4:24 pm PDT August 29, 2011
AAAText Size
PrintEmail
The Oregon Department of Justice Consumer Hotline has received a surge of complaints about telephone calls claiming to be from Wells Fargo Bank. The caller is telling consumers that their debit cards are locked and that they should provide their debit card number to bank security. This is a phishing scam -- and it hit the High Desert Monday.

Oregon Attorney General John Kroger reminded Oregonians that legitimate financial institutions will never ask you for debit card, bank account or social security numbers, or for sensitive information, like your username or password, over the phone or by email.

• Never respond to phone calls or emails soliciting personal information. If you suspect it might be legitimate, pick-up the phone and call the company to confirm.

• Do not click on any links embedded in phishing emails. They may contain viruses or malware designed to steal your personal information.

• Make sure your computer has up to date anti-virus software.

The Attorney General's Consumer Hotline received nine complaints since late last week from the Portland area and the Willamette Valley about this scam, a significant number of calls for such a short period of time -- and many Central Oregonians reported getting similar calls Monday. Bank officials said they had been getting numerous calls about the scammers.

Anyone who believes they have been approached by a scammer should contact the Oregon Department of Justice at 1-877-877-9392 or www.oregonattorneygeneral.gov

Enhanced by Zemanta

MERS MESSING THINGS UP AGAIN


‘MERS morass’ is hanging up negotiations on foreclosure settlement


Paul Sakuma/AP - Myrian Munoz, of Pacifica, Calif., left, and Lili Lu, of Fremont, Calif., rally with other members of the Home Defenders League in San Jose, hoping to stop Bank of America from foreclosing on their homes.

State and federal officials negotiating a settlement with the nation’s biggest banks over shoddy foreclosure practices are hung up on how they should deal with a Reston-based company that has acted as a proxy for financial firms throughout the country for more than a decade.
Some officials refer to the dilemma as the “MERS morass,” referring to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, whose vast but controversial registry contains roughly 65 million mortgages.
Gallery
Gallery
More On This Story

Calculator

The pending multibillion-dollar settlement with banks centers on “robosigned” documents and court filings and other problems related to mortgage servicing that caused a national uproar last fall. Much of that flawed paperwork flowed through MERS.
Meanwhile, the same system helped make possible the boom in mortgage-backed securities that fueled the housing crisis by allowing banks to quickly and cheaply transfer the ownership of loans. Questionable securitization practices have sparked other state and federal investigations, but they are not the focus of the current settlement talks.
Given the broad reach that MERS has into every aspect of the mortgage and foreclosure process, officials have been grappling with whether they can address one element of the MERS business model in the current settlement while leaving other aspects open to future investigation. In part, they say, the patchwork of conflicting laws and court decisions in different states makes a one-size-fits-all solution difficult. In addition, they are facing pressure from banks that already stand to pay billions of dollars in penalties and would prefer to steer clear of the MERS problem altogether in the current negotiations.
Several people familiar with the negotiations said that officials leading the talks have no intention of releasing MERS­CORP, the parent company of MERS, from liability claims. The trickier question is how to address MERS-related foreclosure cases that involve the banks under scrutiny.
“We’re really wrestling with MERS. Does it need to be part of this?” said one official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing. “MERS is a bit of a swamp.”
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan acknowledged in an interview that the issue remains unresolved. She said there are “differing opinions” about how to deal with it.
The MERS quandary is one in a long line of thorny topics that state and federal officials have spent much of the past year wrestling with, as they seek to reach a settlement with five of the nation’s largest banks, including Bank of America. Other dicey issues have included how much they should demand in penalties — the current estimate stands at about $20 billion — as well as how the banks should overhaul their mortgage servicing procedures and whether they should be forced to write down loan balances for some troubled borrowers.
Just this week, a rift over how broad a release the banks should receive from future liability claims in exchange for agreeing to settle boiled over when Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller removed New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman from the committee overseeing the talks on behalf of all 50 states, saying he had actively undermined the group’s efforts to reach a deal. Schneiderman and several others have resisted a quick settlement on servicing problems alone, arguing that all aspects of the mortgage crisis should face a full investigation before moving forward.
That personal tug of war and the other high-profile issues have kept the MERS problem under the radar. But a final settlement is unlikely to materialize until it is resolved.
Some attorneys general have said they would not support a settlement that grants immunity on issues related to MERS and securitization. Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has been among the most vocal and has undertaken an inquiry into MERS.
“We will make sure, at least here in Massachusetts, that we do not reach an agreement that, for instance, gives relief for securitization issues that still need investigation or for fraudulent servicing around the use of MERS,” Coakley said at a news conference this month. “We will not settle an issue until we know all of the facts and we know all of the damage.”

alert4jsw
We have heard so much since the economic crash about how states are laying off teachers, firefighters, cops, and cancelling programs and services because of budget problems. Many of these states have title transfer fees as a source of revenue. Every one of these mortgages should have been assessed these fees every time it changed hands.

Even if it wasn't the primary intent of the MERS system, the end result was fraudulent avoidance of legitimate taxes, funds that the citizen...See More
wesatch
Hey WAPO, the depth of your story is weak as usual. These banks committed fraud. They signed foreclosure documents and filed them at various county courthouses and transferred ownership of mortgages without properly recording these transactions at the same courthouse without concern whether or not they actually owned the mortgages all while signing legal affidavits to that same effect. If an individual did that, he'd be in jail. These folks were agents of the banks. Why aren't people in jail al...See More
1 more (expand)
DELewes
Consumer de-leveraging problems, fraudulent mortgage ownership documentation, upside-down houses... Is there any way we could connect these dots to accelerate consumer de-leveraging without rewarding bad consumer behavior in taking out mortgages? Let's see...

We have these consumers who claim to have been misled into taking out mortgages they could not afford. Well too bad, I don't really believe them. Anyway, they need too take responsibility for their failure to read the fin...See More


Enhanced by Zemanta