Showing posts with label Services. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Services. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

GOLDMAN SACHS IS ONLY THE FIRST. ALL THE OTHER BANKS THAT STEAL PROPERTY AND FUNDS FROM THEIR CUSTOMERS WILL SOON FOLLOW.


Goldman CEO hires prominent defense lawyer

People walk past the entrance to the Goldman Sachs building at 200 West Street, New York June 2, 2011. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton
WASHINGTON | Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:40pm EDT
(Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein has hired high-profile Washington defense attorney Reid Weingarten, according to a government source, as the Justice Department continues to investigate the bank.
Blankfein, 56, is in his sixth year at the helm of the largest U.S. investment bank, which has spent two years fending off accusations of conflicts of interest and fraud.
The move to retain Weingarten comes as investigations of Goldman and its role in the 2007-2009 financial crisis continue.
The news spooked already jittery investors. Goldman shares fell sharply in the final minutes of regular trading after Reuters reporting the hiring, finishing down 4.7 percent at $106.51, their lowest level since March 2009.
They slipped further in after-hours trade to $105.45.
The Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) in April released a scathing report that criticized Goldman for "exploiting" clients by unloading subprime loan exposure onto unsuspecting clients in 2006 and 2007, and concluded that its top executives misled Congress during testimony in 2010.
Goldman has said it disagreed with many of the report's conclusions, but took seriously the issues addressed. The Justice Department launched its investigation in late April.
On Monday, Goldman said: "As is common in such situations, Mr. Blankfein and other individuals who were expected to be interviewed in connection with the Justice Department's inquiry into certain matters raised in the PSI report hired counsel at the outset."
Blankfein has not been charged in any civil or criminal case.
"Why do you bring in someone like that?" said the source, who was not authorized to speak publicly, about Weingarten. "It says one thing: that they're taking it seriously."
Robert Hillman, law professor at the University of California at Davis, said the move showed that the CEO "has some concern over action that is likely to be taken, presumably by the Justice Department." But he added, "It does not signify that he is guilty, or that any action is definitely going to be taken."
Weingarten, whose past clients include a former Enron accounting officer, was in a federal court in New York on Monday for the sentencing of another client, Anthony Cuti, the former CEO of the Duane Reade chain of drugstores, who was convicted of accounting fraud last year. Cuti was sentenced to three years in prison and a $5 million fine.
Weingarten did not respond to requests for comment. The Justice Department declined to comment.
"This was the last thing that Goldman Sachs or any institutions in the sector needed," said Peter Kenny, managing director of Knight Capital in Jersey City, NJ. "There is zero tolerance for risk or perceived risk right now."
HIGH-PROFILE CLIENTS
A partner with Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Weingarten has represented a wide array of clients in criminal cases. They include former WorldCom Inc chief Bernard Ebbers, who was later convicted, and former Enron accounting officer Richard Causey, who pleaded guilty in exchange for a 5 to 7-year prison term.
In May, his client, former GlaxoSmithKline lawyer Lauren Stevens, was acquitted of charges of lying and obstructing a probe into the company's marketing practices.
"I'm used to these monstrously difficult cases where everybody hates my clients," Weingarten told AmericanLawyer.com in May, although he described Stevens as a "beloved figure."
Controversy has continued to swirl around Goldman Sachs and Blankfein in the aftermath of the credit crisis in which Goldman was accused of favoring some clients over others, and of sometimes trading against the interest of clients.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission scored a $550 million settlement against the bank in a fraud lawsuit in July 2010, but other investigations continue.
In June, New York prosecutors subpoenaed the bank to explain its actions in the run-up to the financial crisis. In addition to the Justice Department, the New York Attorney General and the Securities and Exchange Commission are also investigating.
It was not immediately clear what charges, if any, Blankfein could face personally.
One former federal prosecutor, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said Blankfein may have hired outside counsel after receiving a request from investigators for documents or other information.
The Senate report raised questions about inconsistencies between testimony from Blankfein and other Goldman executives to Congress and emails unearthed in the Senate investigation. The subcommittee's chairman, Senator Carl Levin, has said the question of whether Blankfein and others committed perjury is up to the relevant federal agencies.
The former prosecutor cautioned that perjury cases were difficult to prove, adding that prosecutors would not bring charges unless they had a "rock solid case."
Goldman earlier in August lowered its estimate for future legal costs to $2 billion from its $2.7 billion estimate three months earlier. It said it expects such costs to remain high for the foreseeable future.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Additional reporting by Carlyn Kolker, Andrew Longstreth and Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 15, 2011

LOOK FOR ROBO-SIGNGATURE MARSHALL ISAACS, AND NOTARIZATIONS BY LINDA ORLANS, ALISON ORLANS, ANNETTE MATTHEWS, SUSAN SOLWOLD, RENEE CARAMAGNO, ANDREW COLLINS, LINDSAY FENDRICH ON YOUR DOCUMENTS

MICHIGAN: Kama Sutra Of Notary Fraud Discovered

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Kama Sutra Of Notary Fraud Discovered At Multi-State Foreclosure Mill With Ties To MI SOS

Kama Sutra Of Notary Fraud Discovered At Multi-State Foreclosure Mill With Ties To MI SOS
Back in April and May, I posted a series of articles about how robo-signing seems to be out of control at Orlans Associates, a multi-state foreclosure mill located in Troy, Michigan and how the signature of one of their attorneys, Marshall Isaacs has more variations than the Kama Sutra.  It’s pretty obvious that unless Marshall Isaacs suffers from some type of Multiple Personality Disorder, the signatures on the majority of these documents are not his.
I must of struck a nerve with Marshall Isaacs because he made bogus accusations to the Farmington Hills Police that I was committing a felony by blogging about him and his unethical behavior which of course the Oakland County Prosecutor refused to pursue because they deemed it frivolous and unwarranted.
It now appears Marshall Isaacs isn’t the only one in the Orlans organization attempting to play signature Kama Sutra. Five notaries employed at eTitle, a title company owned by Orlans Associates owner, Linda Orlans and run by her daughter Alison, either have multiple and distinct signatures on the documents they notarized for Marshall Isaacs or their signatures don’t match their Notary applications on file with the state of Michigan.
It also appears two of the notaries, Annette Matthews and Susan Solwold missed their calling as a wrist contortionists for Cirque Du Soliel.  Matthews has five different distinct signatures that do not match the signature of her notary application on file with the state of Michigan. Susan Solwold has three different signatures with only one that matches her application on file with the state of Michigan.
Whoever signed Renee Caramagno’s signature on one document filed with Wayne County in August of 2010 didn’t even try to make it look like Caramagno’s signature.
The signatures of two notaries, Andrew Collins and Lindsay Fendrich are all consistent on the public records that eTitle or Orlans filed throughout the state of Michigan.  However, their signatures do not match their notary applications.  The address on Fendrich’s application is that of Orlans’ competitor, Postevio and Associates.
All of this clearly violates the Michigan Notary Public Act (P.A. 238 of 2003):
55.287 Signature of notary public; statements; stamp, seal, or electronic process; effect of illegible statement.
Sec. 27. (1) A notary public shall place his or her signature on every record upon which he or she performs a notarial act. The notary public shall sign his or her name exactly as his or her name appears on his or her application for commission as a notary public.
Of course, this is assuming the person signing as the notary is actually the notary named on the affidavit or assignment.  If these signatures were signed by someone else, it’called fraud.   Either way, this now calls into question the legitimacy of the tens of thousands of mortgage assignments, affidavits and other documents filed by entities controlled by Linda Orlans in five states where the documents were notarized by Michigan notaries employed by Orlans or eTitle.
The Michigan Notary Public Act also offers stiff penalties to notaries and their employers who violate this act namely prosecution and/or civil liabilities to damaged parties especially if the notary was acting under the orders of their employers.
The alleged robo-signing of Marshall Isaacs’ signature and questionable notary signatures on the same documents creates a big problem for Linda Orlans and Marshall Isaacs because they could go to prison.  Yes, the hard core prison where if you know what is good for you, you won’t drop the soap kind of prison.  They could also be held liable for malpractice by their clients.
There is also no reason to suggest BAC or Fannie Mae, two of Orlans’ biggest clients, would come to their aid especially in a case where evidence of improprieties, alleged attorney misconduct  and fraud are stacking up against them on thousands of mortgages everyday.  In the Lucas case, BAC Home Loan Servicing showed no hesitation about throwing Orlans under the bus. In that case, BAC provided an affidavit showing Countrywide Home Loans sold Lucas’ mortgage to Fannie Mae in 2005.  This is after Marshall Isaacs and Orlans filed both a Mortgage Assignment on July 2, 2009 from Countrywide to BAC and a Purchaser’s Affidavit stating BAC sold her mortgage to Fannie Mae in March 2010 with the Benzie County Register of Deeds.
The discovery of multiple fraudulent signatures by employees by a foreclosure mill that handles nearly 40% of the foreclosures in Michigan creates a nightmare scenario for the courts and the counties in Michigan because judges and the counties are now forced to untangle the mess created by the foreclosure mills.  This is a crisis that has the potential to not only rival the chaos of Florida but could in all likelihood surpass it.  Unlike Florida that is a judicial foreclosure state where foreclosures are donein the open, Michigan is a non-judicial where foreclosures get buried until one day they boil up from the ground like the toxic waste that bubbled up from the ground at Love Canal thirty years ago.
Notary fraud in Michigan is supposed to be investigated by the Secretary of State’s office. Unfortunately, any investigation done by Michigan’s new Republican Secretary of State, Ruth Johnson may be considered tainted due to her political ties to both Linda and Alison Orlans. Linda Orlans and her daughter Alison gave Ruth Johnson’s Secretary of State campaign $7200 last year. The Orlanses also gave quite generously to the Michigan Republican Party.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few weeks.
Similar Posts:
Be the first to like this post.

One Response

  1. Love the imagery in this piece

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, April 14, 2011

HERE IS A CALIFORNIA JUDGE THAT "GETS IT" (AND HOW!) REGARDING MERS -- BK JUDGE MARGARET M. MANN

ANOTHER CALIFORNIA BANKRUPTCY JUDGE SLAMS PRETENDER LENDERS AND MERS

CLE SEMINAR: SECURITIZATION WORKSHOP FOR ATTORNEYS — REGISTER NOW

Bankruptcy Judge Margaret M. Mann GETS IT!

1 Posted by Dan Edstrom on April 12, 2011 at 8:19 pm
Bankruptcy Judge Margaret M. Mann GETS IT!
By Daniel Edstrom
DTC Systems, Inc.
Coming off of the heels of in re: Agard (http://dtc-systems.net/2011/02/mers-agency-york-bankruptcy-court-agard/), the Honorable Judge Mann from the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of California took 76 days to review the Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay for the in re: Salazar Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Bankruptcy No: 10-17456-MM13).   The findings of fact and conclusions of law were an amazing reading that confirms many of the issues we have been discussing in regards to loans, securitization and foreclosure.  Like Judge Grossman in the agard case, Judge Mann goes to great lengths to research the details that are applicable to this case.   Here are some highlights:
  • Assignments must be recorded before the foreclosure sale

  • Civil Code Section 2932.5 applies to Deeds of Trust

  • Recorded assignments are necessary despite MERS’ role

  • The Gomes case does not apply [to the Salazar case]

  • US Bank or MERS cannot contract away their obligations to comply with the foreclosure statutes

  • As a matter of law, Salazar’s acknowledgment cannot be read as a waiver of his right to be informed of a change in beneficiary status.

  • MERS System is not an alternative to statutory foreclosure law

  • US Bank as the foreclosing assignee was obligated to record its interest before the sale despite MERS’ initial role under the DOT, and this role cannot be used to bypass Civil Code section 2932.5.  Since US Bank failed to record its interest, Salazar has a valid property interest in his residence that is entitled to protection through the automatic stay

  • Cause does not exist to grant relief from stay

  • Denying relief from stay at this time is the least prejudicial option for both parties


Be the first to like this post.

12 Responses

  1. Don’t get your hopes up yet kiddies, the Fraudclosure industry has many more Aces in the hole and plenty of dirt on all judges state and federal. And I have yet to see any one of them call anybody out on the fact their pensions were defrauded and all homes were foreclosed illegally, because SECURITIZING MORTGAGES IS IMPOSSIBLE AND PAYMENT FOR EVERY LOAN WAS ALREADY RECEIVED IN FULL.
  2. this is some of the better news..
    thx – kickboxer& “THE A MAN,
    EXCUSE ME MAY G-D ALMIGHTY INFLICT THE 10 PLAGUES ON THE BANKSTERS.”
    I have faith that He will. The entire corrupt system will be destroyed and we will watch the vultures pick the meat off of them.
  3. Quote:
    “THE A MAN, on April 14, 2011 at 8:05 am said:
    EXCUSE ME MAY G-D ALMIGHTY INFLICT THE 10 PLAGUES ON THE BANKSTERS.”
    I have faith that He will. The entire corrupt system will be destroyed and we will watch the vultures pick the meat off of them.
  4. EXCUSE ME MAY G-D ALMIGHTY INFLICT THE 10 PLAGUES ON THE BANKSTERS.
  5. Monday night is the start of Passover. The Pharoahs didnt get it either. We must inflict the 10 plagues on the Banksters.
    HAPPY PASSOVER NEIL GARFIELD FAMILY AND ASSOCIATES.
    TO MY CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS HAPPY EASTER.
    AND TO THE REST OF HUMANITY HAPPY HOLIDAYS.
  6. “Lenders” are not saying “UNCLE.”
    See below quote from the article. “More normal level of foreclosures”?????? Are these guys kidding??? How did foreclosures become a “Goal” to be achieved???
    Why Foreclosures Could Be Set to Rise Again
    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    “The bottleneck is opening up a little bit and we’re starting to see the first inklings that we might be getting back to more normal levels of foreclosures,” said Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac.
    By normal levels, Sharga means the elevated pace of foreclosure activity that led to more than 1 million homes being taken back by lenders last year.”
  7. California Civil Code Section 2932.5
    Legal Research Home > California Laws > Civil Code > California Civil Code Section 2932.5
    Where a power to sell real property is given to a
    mortgagee, or other encumbrancer, in an instrument intended to secure
    the payment of money, the power is part of the security and vests in
    any person who by assignment becomes entitled to payment of the
    money secured by the instrument. The power of sale may be exercised
    by the assignee if the assignment is duly acknowledged and recorded.
    ASSIGNMENT must be recorded.
  8. Yes, it is about time that California judges start applying the law. I was beginning to think all Cali judges were bought and paid for.
  9. The tide is slowly turning. I have been waiting for this for three years. California has been one of the worst-hit states in the fraudclosure crisis. It is good to see something come around for them. California has very expensive real estate, and the banksters want to get their hands on it. I hope there is a giant surge of lawsuits in or out of bankruptcy court. Kick their butts. Burmese8@yahoo.com
  10. Attorney blog with dozens of motion to dismiss complaint examples.
  11. John posted this 2 days ago. thanx john and thanx dan edstrom.
  12. But this is only one judge and the Appelate courts must recognize.

Enhanced by Zemanta