37 OUT OF 40 WERE BAD. 37 OUT OF 40 HAD A BROKEN CHAIN OF TITLE. THAT SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT. AND YET, OUR COURT SYSTEM DOES NOTHING. (EXCEPTION: JUDGE SCHACK.)

More Foreclosure Fraud by Banks – New York Post Finds “House of Cards”

August 15, 2011John MurphyLeave a commentGo to comments

 

Rate This

The New York Post, while not necessarily known for hard hitting investigative research and analysis, has published a story this weekend about its findings after a 3 month investigative report on foreclosures in New York state.  To their surprise, of the sample 40 foreclosures that they had looked at, 37 of them had a broken chain of title.  For those who follow this stuff, you can’t sell or transfer property without having the property chain of title.

The investigation looked at foreclosures that were part of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing.  The reason they looked at Chapter 13′s is because the bank has to prove it has rights to the property in order to make the claim on the debt.  According to the New York Post, they looked at “Chapter 13 filings because the banks or mortgage servicers file proofs of claim for the debt and must, under penalty of perjury, include accurate information about the mortgage, note and fees. In New York, filing public records with “intent to deceive” is a felony.”

Despite all the coverage this past winter of robo-signing issues, issues with this practice apparently are continuing.

“The largest financial institutions in the US are doing it every day, and I have not seen it slow down or stop,” says Westchester attorney Linda Tirelli. “The game is always the same: Make up documents and foreclose as fast as you can.”

The 50 States Attorneys General along with the U.S. Department of Treasury are trying to negotiate a $25 billion deal to provide immunity for the banks so they don’t have to defend their mortgage practices and prove that they have the proper documents in order to foreclose.  If approved, this will eliminate the rights of homeowners to pursue a legal option against the banks.  For now, homeowners are still able to sue the banks in order to have them prove that they have the right to foreclose.  In Minneapolis, one attorney who is charging ahead to help homeowners is Bill Butler.

Related articles

• More Foreclosure Fraud by Banks - New York Post Finds "House of Cards" (johnmurphyreports.com)


• Homeless Man Walks Past Ann Curry's House [New York Post] (gawker.com)


• Bank of America Uses Attack Dog to Smear NY AG Schneiderman (news.firedoglake.com)


• Morning Buzz (cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com)


• Vibe and Vegas Show: There's a Bigger House of Cards That Hurt Minorities Wealth (thevibeandvegasshow.wordpress.com)


• New York Post Compares Stock Market To 'Hooker' (thegloss.com)


• Silicon Alley Insider: Which Tech Billionaire Is Turning Down Models Left And Right? (businessinsider.com)


• New York Post Really Outdoes Itself Today, Headline-Wise [Tabloids] (gawker.com)


• Media Decoder: New York Post Employees Told to 'Preserve' Documents (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com)


• Stephen Colbert Wasn't Too Impressed with Wednesday's New York Post [Video] (gawker.com)

LEGAL.COM EXCELLENT BLOG FOR CASE LAW

McLEOD v. BANKIER ROBERT S. McLEOD, Appellant, v. MARVIN ADAM BANKIER, an individual,  SCOTT ALLEN ELK, an individual,  ERIC CHRISTU, an individual,  and ELK BANKIER CHRISTU, P.A.,1 Appellees. No. 4D10-37.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 8, 2011. Diane H. Tutt of Diane H. Tutt, P.A., Davie, and G. Ware Cornell, Jr., of Cornell & Associates, P.A., Weston, for appellant. Robert M. Klein, Houston S. Park and Jeanette A. Bellon of Stephens Lynn Klein, P.L., West Palm Beach, for appellees, Marvin Adam Bankier, Eric Christu and Elk Bankier Christu, P.A. Robert McLeod timely appeals the final summary judgment in favor of Marvin Adam Bankier, Eric Christu, and Elk Bankier Christu, P.A. (collectively "Elk Bankier"). We affirm because, as a matter of law, the trial court correctly determined that the applicable statute of limitations had expired before McLeod brought suit for legal malpractice against his former attorneys. The following recitation constitutes the undisputed material facts upon which the trial court relied in reaching its conclusion. In 1998, McLeod hired attorney Thomas Tew to represent him in a claim against Fidelity Investments ("Fidelity") for executing a wrongful margin call on his securities account, which resulted in the liquidation of his account. That case was ultimately settled, and thesettlement agreement contained a general release in favor of Fidelity. Although not set forth in the settlement agreement, it was McLeod's understanding that his account balance would be restored to the status quo ante. When that did not occur, he began to express concerns to Tew that Fidelity had not returned the funds to his account. The funds were never returned, and, in March of 2000, Tew severed his representation of McLeod. In December 2002, McLeod hired Elk Bankier to file a claim against Fidelity through the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD"). McLeod did not retain Elk Bankier to pursue a legal malpractice claim against Tew. Elk Bankier filed McLeod's claim through the NASD's arbitration process. In November 2003, the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Fidelity and against McLeod, dismissing McLeod's claim. Thereafter, Elk Bankier raised the possibility of McLeod suing Tew on a theory of professional negligence based on Tew's recommendation that McLeod sign the settlement agreement with Fidelity. The firm referred McLeod to another attorney who specialized in legal malpractice. That attorney advised McLeod that he had no valid claim against his former legal counsel. In February 2004, Elk Bankier ceased to represent McLeod. In 2004, McLeod sought the legal services of attorney William Isenberg to continue pursuing his claim against Fidelity. Attorney Isenberg recommended pursuing a legal malpractice claim against Tew rather than pursuing an appeal of the NASD arbitration panel's ruling. McLeod ignored attorney Isenberg's advice and took no action against any of his former attorneys until his filing of the malpractice action against Elk Bankier in January of 2008. In his complaint, McLeod alleged that Elk Bankier negligently allowed the two-year statute of limitations to expire on his legal malpractice claim against Tew. In its motion for summary judgment, Elk Bankier argued, among other things, that the two-year statute of limitations on McLeod's claim against Tew began to run on the date Tew terminated his relationship with McLeod (2000), but certainly no later than the date of the adverse NASD arbitration decision (2003). Accordingly, even under the most liberal application of the facts, McLeod had until November of 2005 to file an action against Tew. Our standard of review on orders granting summary judgment is de novo. Furtado v. Yun Chung Law, 51 So.3d 1269, 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Summary judgment should be granted `"only where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'" Id. at 1274 (quoting Cohen v. Arvin, 878 So.2d 403, 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)).

• IHENACHO v. OHIO INST. OF PHOTOGRAPHY & TECHNOLOGY • IN THE MATTER OF INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIPS OF R.P. • JASPER v. THALER • PICARD v. HSBC BANK PLC • IN THE MATTER OF TERMINATION OF PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP OF K.S. v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES • NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC v. HUMPHREY • ALLEN v. HILL • IN RE WHITTLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. DEBTOR. • BURKE v. BURKE • EON-NET LP v. FLAGSTAR BANCORP

• EXPOSOFT SOLUTIONS USA LTD. v. COCA-COLA COMPANY

• A GOOD TIME RENTAL, LLC v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE AGENCY, INC.

• PETERSON v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

• GUIDEONE INSURANCE CO. v. U.S. WATER SYSTEMS, INC.

• PEOPLE EX REL. HARRIS v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLY COMPANY

• PEOPLE v. GERBER

• McLEOD v. BANKIER

• SOUTHEAST MISSOURI HOSPITAL v. C.R. BARD, INC.

• IN RE ESTATE OF MARUN

• SUN NATIONAL BANK v. VISCI

Related articles

• John Reid to stand down as Celtic chairman (guardian.co.uk)
• Reid to stand down at Celtic (skysports.com)
• Ian Bankier to be new Celtic chairman when combative John Reid stands down later this year (telegraph.co.uk)
• Guns No More ? (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
• Reid to exit as Celtic chairman (news.bbc.co.uk)
• Badminton chiefs scrap controversial skirt rule (news.bbc.co.uk)
• Things To Do & See - Golden Lakes Village & West Palm Beach, Florida (goldenlakesvillage.wordpress.com)
• Badminton dress code for women shelved (humanistlife.org.uk)
• CHRISTUS Health Selects MEDSEEK for Consumer Portal, Strategic Partnership (prweb.com)